C.A.T. DECLINES STAY IN OA No.2395/2010( "Dr. Manisha Malhotra & Ors. Vs. UOI & ors.) ON 12-8-2010
DOCTORS APPROACH C.A.T. AFTER DENIAL OF BENEFITS OF DACP BY MOHFW
Please read the message board at www.dadwa.com
Friday, August 13, 2010
Wednesday, August 11, 2010
Message from -Dr. Vijay Rai, Secretary :-DADWA DOCTORS RESORT TO LITIGATION
Dear All,
DOCTORS RESORT TO LITIGATION : THANKS TO DIVISIVE POLICIES OF GOVT
Message from -Dr. Vijay Rai, Secretary DADWA from www.dadwa.com
Dr Marwah
Message Update 10-8-2010
DOCTORS RESORT TO LITIGATION : THANKS TO DIVISIVE POLICIES OF GOVT.
DADWA had stated earlier on this column that benefits of DACP committed by the MOHFW in Oct. 2008 could be used to divide the members of CHS further. Hundreds of CHS Officers from various sub-cadres of CHS missed inclusion in the list of those who got SAG following DACP. The root cause was change of R/R’s from 3 ‘very good’ grade our of 5 ACR’s to 5 such grades out of 5. Ideally such changes should have been implemented prospectively and not retrospectively but that was not to be.
Now please see the situation. First hundreds of ACR’s pertaining to several years were found missing and the members of CHS were asked to get their ACR’s to the MOHFW. Then was the change of bench mark grades and then delay in DPC’s and then inability of the DPC’s to take cognizance of overall performance of the officers whose were found below the bench mark grades and then inability to communicate the crucial lower grades to the officers concerned and so on. The process of such communication and inviting representations has started but it is too little and too late.
Who has been at the receiving end due to such errors of omission and commission? Any one can guess and as expected, affected doctors (almost 33%) are angry and some have approached the court. DADWA fully supports proactive actions by all such CHS Officers whether in Delhi Govt. or not. One such OA has been filed by about 20 aggrieved doctors in CAT wherein in additions to the remedy to their grievance, reportedly they have sought a stay on the ongoing exercise by MOHFW wherein lists are being finalized to give benefits of DACP to doctors of CHS and some lists are already out. The said OA is listed for 12-8-10.
The core committee of DADWA has deliberated on the issues involved. It understands that the grievance of affected doctors is genuine and deserves remedy, but there is a need to assess the impact of a possible stay if sought by the applicant doctors. MOHFW would be responding to the OA but is may not be surprising if it may lukewarm in contesting the prayer for a stay by Hon’ble CAT. For example there is no reason for the MOHFW to apprise the court of the delay of almost 2 years in reaching to this stage and consequent loss financial loss to hundreds of doctors. Further stay would entitle it to stop the work altogether while senior doctors would continue to retire.
View of DADWA on the Subject: The core committee of DADWA is of the view that,
First facts are to be ascertained as to whether stay has really been sought in the OA coming on 12-8-10? If yes, what are the grounds.
Seek a legal opinion about an ideal course of action so as to protect the interest of both the groups viz. Promoted and not promoted. The view that emerged is that DADWA while supporting the plea of applicants seeking justice viz, promotion and financial benefits of DACP from retrospect (Oct. 2008) without loss of seniority DADWA should request the court to give it an opportunity to present the case of those CHS Officers who are likely to be affected in case Hon’ble CAT grants a stay.
Act decisively and fast so as to meet the deadline of 12-8-10.
It is true that DADWA came to know of these developments late, but it believes that remedy is possible. We seek your full support of that of all groups of doctors and associations. Please give send your views on email to secretarydadwa@rediffmail.com or through views section of this website. -Dr. Vijay Rai, Secretary DADWA
DOCTORS RESORT TO LITIGATION : THANKS TO DIVISIVE POLICIES OF GOVT
Message from -Dr. Vijay Rai, Secretary DADWA from www.dadwa.com
Dr Marwah
Message Update 10-8-2010
DOCTORS RESORT TO LITIGATION : THANKS TO DIVISIVE POLICIES OF GOVT.
DADWA had stated earlier on this column that benefits of DACP committed by the MOHFW in Oct. 2008 could be used to divide the members of CHS further. Hundreds of CHS Officers from various sub-cadres of CHS missed inclusion in the list of those who got SAG following DACP. The root cause was change of R/R’s from 3 ‘very good’ grade our of 5 ACR’s to 5 such grades out of 5. Ideally such changes should have been implemented prospectively and not retrospectively but that was not to be.
Now please see the situation. First hundreds of ACR’s pertaining to several years were found missing and the members of CHS were asked to get their ACR’s to the MOHFW. Then was the change of bench mark grades and then delay in DPC’s and then inability of the DPC’s to take cognizance of overall performance of the officers whose were found below the bench mark grades and then inability to communicate the crucial lower grades to the officers concerned and so on. The process of such communication and inviting representations has started but it is too little and too late.
Who has been at the receiving end due to such errors of omission and commission? Any one can guess and as expected, affected doctors (almost 33%) are angry and some have approached the court. DADWA fully supports proactive actions by all such CHS Officers whether in Delhi Govt. or not. One such OA has been filed by about 20 aggrieved doctors in CAT wherein in additions to the remedy to their grievance, reportedly they have sought a stay on the ongoing exercise by MOHFW wherein lists are being finalized to give benefits of DACP to doctors of CHS and some lists are already out. The said OA is listed for 12-8-10.
The core committee of DADWA has deliberated on the issues involved. It understands that the grievance of affected doctors is genuine and deserves remedy, but there is a need to assess the impact of a possible stay if sought by the applicant doctors. MOHFW would be responding to the OA but is may not be surprising if it may lukewarm in contesting the prayer for a stay by Hon’ble CAT. For example there is no reason for the MOHFW to apprise the court of the delay of almost 2 years in reaching to this stage and consequent loss financial loss to hundreds of doctors. Further stay would entitle it to stop the work altogether while senior doctors would continue to retire.
View of DADWA on the Subject: The core committee of DADWA is of the view that,
First facts are to be ascertained as to whether stay has really been sought in the OA coming on 12-8-10? If yes, what are the grounds.
Seek a legal opinion about an ideal course of action so as to protect the interest of both the groups viz. Promoted and not promoted. The view that emerged is that DADWA while supporting the plea of applicants seeking justice viz, promotion and financial benefits of DACP from retrospect (Oct. 2008) without loss of seniority DADWA should request the court to give it an opportunity to present the case of those CHS Officers who are likely to be affected in case Hon’ble CAT grants a stay.
Act decisively and fast so as to meet the deadline of 12-8-10.
It is true that DADWA came to know of these developments late, but it believes that remedy is possible. We seek your full support of that of all groups of doctors and associations. Please give send your views on email to secretarydadwa@rediffmail.com or through views section of this website. -Dr. Vijay Rai, Secretary DADWA
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
Follow-up Treatment of CGHS Beneficiaries in Recognized Hospitals
MONDAY, JUNE 21, 2010
Follow-up Treatment of CGHS Beneficiaries in Recognized Hospitals
The undersigned is directed to refer office memodum No. S.11017/1/95-CGHS (P), dated September 20, 1995 and to say that it has been decided to modify the order in view of difficulties being faced by Central Government Health Scheme beneficiaries.
It has now been decided that the CGHS beneficiaries will beeligible for follow-up treatment relating to Neuro Surgery, Cardiac Surgery (including Coronary Angioplasty & implants), Cancer Surgery/Chemotherapy/Radiotherapy, Kidney transplantation, Hip/Knee replacement Surgery and Accident cases in the same Institutions/Hospitals where the treatment was earlier carried out with prior permission of competent authority. The follow-up treatment will however, be subject to the following conditions :
- The reimbursement of expenditure for Consultation/Treatment including hospitalization if required/Investigations will be limited to rates as fixedunder Central Government Health Scheme.
- The beneficiary should collect all the OPD medicinesprescribed in connection with the treatment from the dispensary concerned in normal timing. In emergency these could be procured from market.
- In case there is no approved CGHS rates for any procedure, or test, reimbursement will be made as per All India Institute of Medical Sciences rates, if any, or actual whichever is less or as per actual in case there is no AIIMS rates also.
- Reimbursement in respect of Central Government Employees and other working employees and pensioners of autonomous bodies which were covered under CGHS will be made by respective departments from Service Head; from Rajya Sabha/Lok Sabha Secretariat as the case may be in case of Member of Parliament and EX-Member of Parliament. In respect of Central Government Pensioners, Freedom fighters etc. covered under Central Government Health Scheme, the reimbursement will be made by respective Additional/Joint/Deputy Director of CGHS of concerned City from CGHS head.
- Permission for follow-up treatment may be granted by the Head of the Department in case of Central Government Employees, working employees and pensioners of Autonomous Bodies admitted under the scheme and by Rajya Sabha Secretariat/Lok Sabha Secretariat as the case may be in case of Members of Parliament and Ex-MPs and by CMO Incharge of concerned CGHS Dispensary in case of Pensioners, Freedom Fighters etc. for 3-6 months at a time, which may be extended if required on the bases of medical record.
- In case of other conditions 9other than those mentioned earlier) where prior permission for treatment in a private hospital recognized under CGHS is granted, regular follow-up treatment is to be obtained from CGHS Dispensary/CGHS/Govt. specialist only. However the OPD medicines prescribed on discharge summary may be issued by concerned CGHS dispensary up to a maximum period of one month.
- Permission for follow-up treatment in case of accidents, where patients were admitted under emergency without prior permission in recognized hospitals under CGHS may be considered by Head of CGHS Organization of city concerned subject to Ex-post facto sanction for initial treatment based on discharge summary and possession of a valid CGHS card. In such cases Medical reimbursement claim may be accompanied by a copy of the Permission letter.
- In exceptional cases where permission for treatment of the above mentioned conditions in a private un-recognized hospital was granted by Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, permission for follow-up treatment may be considered by Head of CGHS organization of concerned city on a case to case basis and HOD in respective cities.
- This issues with the concurrence of Finance Division vide Dy. No. 2266/JS (FA) dated 4/4/2001.
Sunday, August 9, 2009
Admissibility / Entitlement for traveling by Shatabadl Express
Admissibility / Entitlement for traveling by Shatabadl Express
No.19030/3/2008-E.IV
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Expenditure
.........
NewDelhi,Dated 29th June,2009.
OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Subject:- Admissibility / entitlement for traveling by Shatabadl Express.
.........
The undersigned is directed to refer to para 2 A of Annexure to this Department's OM of even number dilled 23.9.2008 and to clarify that for the purpose of journeys on tour, officers drawing Grade Pay of Rs.7600 and above are entitled to travel by Executive Class in Shatabadi trains and AC First Class In Rajdhani trains.
--
Dr Marwah
Sunday, July 26, 2009
Fwd: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS <ushanandhinite@gmail.com>
Date: 2009/7/25
Subject: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS
To: gomarwah@gmail.com
From: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS <ushanandhinite@gmail.com>
Date: 2009/7/25
Subject: CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS
To: gomarwah@gmail.com
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS |
| Posted: 24 Jul 2009 07:31 PM PDT No. 13018/1/2009-Estt.(L) GOVERNMENT OF INDIA Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions (Department of Pension & Pensioners'Welfare) Lok Nayak Bhawan,New Delhi-110003 OFFICE MEMORANDUM Sub: Enhancement of Child Adoption Leave from 135 days to 180 days and extension of the facility of Paternity Leave to adoptive fathers. The undersigned is directed to refer to this Department's O.M. No.13018/4/2004-Estt.(L) dated 31st March, 2006 regarding grant of Child Adoption Leave for 135 days to female Government servant on adoption of a child upto the age of one year, on the lines of maternity leave admissible to natural mothers. After implementation of the Sixth Central Pay Commission recommendations, the period of maternity leave was enhanced from 135 days to 180 days. Subsequently, this Department has received representations requesting for enhancement of the period of Child Adoption Leave from 135 days to 180 days in line with the maternity leave. The matter has been examined in this Department and it has been decided to enhance the period of Child Adoption Leave from 135 days to 180 days. 2. A female Government servant in whose case the period of 135 days of Child Adoption Leave has not expired on the date of issue of these orders shall also be eligible for Child Adoption Leave of 180 days. 3. It has also been decided that a male Government servant (including an apprentice) with less than two surviving children, on valid adoption of a child below the age of one year, may be sanctioned Paternity Leave for a period of 15 days within a period of six months from the date of valid adoption. 4. These orders shall take effect from the date of issue. 5. In so far as persons serving in the Indian Audit and Accounts Department are conceded, these orders issue in consultation with the Comptroller and Auditor General of India. this is a test message |
| You are subscribed to email updates from CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Inbox too full? | |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
--
Dr Marwah
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
